Showing posts with label causes of urbanisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label causes of urbanisation. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Management strategies: How can we reverse the detrimental effects of 'hyperurbanisation'?

In Mumbai, a US trained architect Mukesh Mehta has proposed a £2 billion redevelopment programme for Dharavi slum which would entail the building of parks, gardens and new apartment blocks.



This rehousing project has faced major criticism.
-The envisioned apartments would be 14 storeys high and offer only 25m2 of space per family.
-There are concerns that the plans to only rehouse citizens who had settled pre-2000 will displace many families.
-The community spirit and informal sector would be threatened. There is little hope that the small pottery and textile workshops would be catered for.

Surely there are alternatives?
-There are proposals for local scale development
-For example the extension of existing buildings is a possibility: an extra floor with a 14ft window would ease overcrowding in households and reduces dependency on ventilation (reducing electricity needs)
-Surveys have suggested that small scale developments like improvements to drainage would be favoured
-Young Architects have proposed the idea of having 'spaceways in the sky' these are wide corridors connecting homes, replicating the streets. These would provide space for traditional crafts and maintain community spirit

-Many say the approach in Brazil is far more sustainable, with their site and service schemes provided in the favelas - there is provision of breeze blocks and materials for plumbing

Saturday, 30 May 2015

Urbanisation in a LEDC City: Mumbai

A case study of HYPERURBANISATION
Where is Mumbai?: Western Coast of India, located on the coast of the Arabian Sea

Important Background information:
-Mumbai was previously known as Bombay
-It was colonised by the British in the 1600s
-Populations growth was half that of Europe in the 19th Century
-Could this have been due to the British rule... the import of grain from India to Europe?
-It led to scarcities and famines... restricting the development of the country
[Another example of the link of economic development and urbanisation]
-The climate is tropical exacerbating the problems within the slum areas
-It gained independence in 1947 [the rate of urbanisation increased to 5%]
-The Suez Canal encouraged the growth of the booming cotton trade
-It was known as the 'Manchester of the East'... *N.B. the city is now diversifying into IT services

Mumbai should be known as 'a city of contrasts'- that is, it is highly polarised.
-Its successes economically are paralleled by the growth of slums around its periphery

It has developed economically and yields politically/cultural influence:
-Bollywood - Hindi language film industry
-Rents are higher than in New York and London!
-40% of India's foreign trade is channelled through Mumbai
-Growing middle class: 3 million

This is contrasted by the dire poverty:
-60% of Mumbai's population lives in slum conditions
-The slum provide little taxes as the informal sector dominates
-150,000 single room factories or 'cottage industries'- wages can be $40 a month or lower

Wikipedia: Sourcing information on Causes of Urbanisation

Urbanization occurs as individual, commercial flight, social and governmental efforts reduce time and expense in commuting and transportation and improve opportunities for jobs, education, housing, and transportation. Living in cities permits the advantages of the opportunities of proximity, diversity, and marketplace competition. However, the advantages of urbanization are weighed against alienation issues, stress, increased daily life costs, and negative social aspects that result from mass marginalization. Suburbanization, which is happening in the cities of the largest developing countries, was sold and seen as an attempt to balance these negative aspects of urban life while still allowing access to the large extent of shared resources.
Cities are known to be places where money, services, wealth and opportunities are centralized. Many rural inhabitants come to the city for reasons of seeking fortunes and social mobility. Businesses, which provide jobs and exchange capital are more concentrated in urban areas. Whether the source is trade or tourism, it is also through the ports or banking systems that foreign money flows into a country, commonly located in cities.
Economic opportunities are just one reason people move into cities, though they do not go to fully explain why urbanization rates have exploded only recently in places like China and India. Rural flight is a contributing factor to urbanization. In rural areas, often on small family farms or collective farms in villages, it has traditionally been difficult to access manufactured goods, though overall quality of life is very subjective, and may certainly surpass that of the city. Farm living has always been susceptible to unpredictable environmental conditions, and in times of drought, flood or pestilence, survival may become extremely problematic.

In a New York Times article concerning the acute migration away from farming in Thailand, life as a farmer was described as "hot and exhausting." "Everyone says the farmer works the hardest but gets the least amount of money". In an effort to counter this impression, the Agriculture Department of Thailand is seeking to promote the impression that farming is "honorable and secure".[16]
However, in Thailand, urbanization has also resulted in massive increases in problems such as obesity. City life, especially in modern urban slums of the developing world, is certainly hardly immune to pestilence or climatic disturbances such as floods, yet continues to strongly attract migrants. Examples of this were the 2011 Thailand floods and 2007 Jakarta flood. Urban areas are also far more prone to violence, drugs, and other urban social problems. In the case of the United States, industrialization of agriculture has negatively affected the economy of small and middle-sized farms and strongly reduced the size of the rural labour market.

Particularly in the developing world, conflict over land rights due to the effects of globalization has led to less politically powerful groups, such as farmers, losing or forfeiting their land, resulting in obligatory migration into cities. In China, where land acquisition measures are forceful, there has been far more extensive and rapid urbanization (54%) than in India (36%), where peasants form militant groups (e.g. Naxalites) to oppose such efforts. Obligatory and unplanned migration often results in rapid growth of slums. This is also similar to areas of violent conflict, where people are driven off their land due to violence. Bogota, Colombia is one example of this.
Cities offer a larger variety of services, such as specialist services that aren't found in rural areas. Supporting the provision of these services requires workers, resulting in more numerous and varied job opportunities. Elderly individuals may be forced to move to cities where there are doctors and hospitals that can cater for their health needs. Varied and high quality educational opportunities are another factor in urban migration, as well as the opportunity to join, develop, and seek out social communities.
Urbanization also creates greater opportunities for women that are otherwise denied to them living in rural areas. This creates a gender-related transformation where women are engaged in paid employment and have access to education resulting in demographic implications in which fertility levels decline. However, women are still at a disadvantage due to their unequal position in the labour market, their inability to secure assets independently from male relatives and exposure to violence.

People located in cities are more productive than those working outside dense agglomerations. An important question for the policy makers as well as for clustering people deals with the causality of this relationship, that is whether people become more productive in cities due to certain agglomeration effects or are cities simply attracting those who are more productive. Economists have recently shown that there exists indeed a large productivity gain due to locating in dense agglomerations. It is thus possible that agents locate in cities in order to benefit from these agglomeration effects

What causes lie behind the increase in urban agglomerations?

An urban agglomeration is an extended city or town area comprising the built-up area of a central place.

1. 'Communication economies'.
Companies prefer being situated close to one another. It offers the benefits of shared infrastructure, low transport costs and simplicity of organising face to face contact.
 London is an excellent example of this. Think about the 'banking area' Canary Wharf or... Lime Street where Lloyds, Willis and the 'Walkie Talkie' building are all located close together.

2. Cumulative causation or the 'multiplier effect'.
 
Learn diagrams for the exam, increases marks.
 
The 'mass-gravity' effect is linked in here. This is the idea that success breeds success.
 
3. The 'basic inputs'.
This refers simply to the addition of people to the urban population via NATURAL INCREASE and RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION
 
4. Status-Symbol syndrome
This conveys the idea that cities often have a 'prestige' about them as events/development is centred there.
People are attracted to being at 'the centre of things'
London is often called a 'magnet' or 'sinkhole' for young newly graduated people.
 
5. Development.
This refers to general economic development and advances in technology such as transport.
Think about the effect of the electrification of the main line in the UK. The reduced travel times meant that people could travel with greater ease up and down the country. 70% of train journeys begin or end in London.